Appeals Workflow
Last reviewed:
Quick Answer
The Appeals Workflow uses AI to analyze denial reasons, identify supporting clinical evidence and policy language, and generate appeal documentation. AI learns from successful appeals to improve future authorization submissions and appeal strategies.
Definition
Key Points
- Analyzes denial letter to extract specific denial reasons
- Identifies gaps in original authorization submission
- Retrieves additional clinical evidence from EHR
- Matches evidence to payer appeal criteria
- Generates appeal letter with enhanced medical necessity argument
- Cites relevant policy language and clinical guidelines
- Learns from successful appeals to improve future submissions
- Reduces appeal turnaround time by 50%
How It Works
Denial Analysis
Parse denial letter to extract: denial reason codes, payer rationale, missing documentation cited, appeal deadline.
Gap Identification
Compare denial reasons to original submission. Identify what evidence was missing or insufficient.
Evidence Retrieval
Search EHR for additional supporting evidence: updated clinical notes, new test results, specialist consultations, treatment progress.
Policy Research
Review payer medical policies, coverage determinations, and appeal precedents for similar cases.
Clinical Guideline Support
Identify clinical guidelines and literature supporting medical necessity. Cite evidence-based recommendations.
Appeal Letter Generation
Generate appeal letter addressing each denial reason with supporting clinical evidence and policy citations.
Evidence Package Assembly
Compile complete appeal package: appeal letter, additional clinical documentation, guideline citations, expert opinions if available.
Submission & Tracking
Submit appeal within deadline. Track appeal status and escalate if approaching decision timeline.