Coverage Determination Workflow
Last reviewed:
Quick Answer
The Coverage Determination Workflow uses AI to analyze insurance policy language, exclusions, and endorsements against claim facts to determine whether coverage applies. AI interprets policy terms, evaluates exclusions, and provides explainable coverage determinations with citations to specific policy provisions.
Definition
Key Points
- Retrieves and parses policy documents (declarations, forms, endorsements)
- Maps claim facts to policy coverage provisions
- Evaluates applicability of exclusions and exceptions
- Handles coordination of benefits across multiple policies
- Cites specific policy sections for every determination
- Flags ambiguities for human adjuster review
- Achieves 85-95% accuracy on standard policy forms
- Provides confidence scores and alternative interpretations
How It Works
Policy Retrieval
Retrieve policy documents from policy management system: declarations page, policy forms, endorsements, exclusions.
Claim Facts Extraction
Extract structured facts from claim: loss type, cause of loss, date, location, parties involved, damages claimed.
Coverage Grant Analysis
Analyze which policy coverages might apply: liability, collision, comprehensive, property damage, bodily injury.
Exclusion Evaluation
Check whether exclusions apply: intentional acts, wear and tear, business use, specific perils. Evaluate exceptions to exclusions.
Policy Limits Check
Verify claim is within policy limits, sub-limits, and deductibles. Flag if claim exceeds coverage.
Coordination of Benefits
If multiple policies apply, determine primary vs. excess coverage and coordinate between policies.
Coverage Determination
Generate coverage decision: covered, not covered, or requires adjuster review. Include confidence score.
Rationale & Citations
Provide explainable rationale citing specific policy sections, exclusions evaluated, and reasoning for determination.
Decision Logic: Coverage Grant → Exclusions → Exceptions
Step 1 - Coverage Grant: Does the policy insuring agreement cover this type of loss? (e.g., "We will pay for direct physical loss to your covered auto")
Step 2 - Exclusions: Do any exclusions take coverage away? (e.g., "We do not cover loss from wear and tear")
Step 3 - Exceptions to Exclusions: Do any exceptions bring coverage back? (e.g., "But we do cover loss caused by...")
When to Escalate to Human Adjuster
- •Ambiguous policy language requiring interpretation
- •Novel claim scenarios not covered in training data
- •Manuscript endorsements with non-standard language
- •Multiple conflicting exclusions and exceptions
- •State-specific case law heavily influences interpretation
- •Low confidence score (<70%) on coverage determination